Each of the NCAA’s membership divisions includes a philosophy statement in its Manual that describes the nature and purposes of Divisions I, II and III.
Frankly, they are only words.
Division I explicitly offers its statement as a non-binding “guide” for the preparation of bylaws and implementation of institutional and conference programs. Division II enumerates aspirations and beliefs that should be held in common by its members, while Division III offers principles intended collectively to position athletics within higher education.
The statements reveal differences – some pronounced, others subtle – in the role and scale of athletics in each group. But again, they are only words. They gain their true meaning only in how they are practiced and in the outcomes they influence.
Perhaps one of the NCAA’s greatest strengths is that each of these statements – even as they portray differences among the divisions – also point to a few common purposes.
All advocate in one form or another what Division I calls “extensive opportunities for participation in varsity intercollegiate athletics for both men and women.” And all three divisions can claim credit for their own specific practices and be proud of positive outcomes in this regard – though they must remain vigilant in preserving the availability and quality of existing programs even as they broaden the array of sports options for enrolling students.
There are references to, as Division II puts it, “development of positive societal attitudes.” Such words might easily be put aside as merely a platitude, but in fact, the divisions increasingly are concerning themselves with sportsmanship, which promises not only to improve public perceptions of college athletics but also to help achieve a more civil society.
And all three divisions advocate what Division III refers to as “the overall quality of the educational experience and … successful completion of all students’ academic programs.”
As a Muhlenberg soccer player puts it elsewhere on this page, many student-athletes are looking for something beyond playing sports in college. It’s hard to envision any place on earth better suited than any one of the campuses at the NCAA’s 1,000-plus member schools – given the array of educational and societal opportunities offered by each of those schools – for providing that “something.”
The words – merely words – in each division’s philosophy statement point to desirable outcomes that often are difficult to achieve. But achieving those results are worth the effort. Why else would we put such goals into words?